King supports his discussion by establishing authority and appealing to his listeners emotions. He calls the situation some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war. War was an inhuman and barbaric exercise and America's participation was not in human interest. Encompassed within this quote is pathos because the harsh accusation leads the reader to think poorly of the government while pitying the poor. The fact that young black men are being sent [across the world] to fight for the liberties in Southeast Asia, which they [have] not found in Georgia and East Harlem questions the validity of Americas founding principles of the unalienable rights of every individual; life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. His use of diction and imagery arouses anger while increasing his credibility since he criticizes the unjust war he describes. No one should be restricted from rights and opportunities that others are given for that long. King draws sympathy for his cause from the reader who sees the unjustness of the situation he and his followers are dealing with. He is using historical facts to create a parallel between the current situation and the past. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. If it is, let us trace its movements and pray that our own inner being may be sensitive to its guidance, for we are deeply in need of a new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. All rights reserved. King said, the war was doing far more than devastating the hopes of the poor at homeWe were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. One of Kings main techniques he uses to persuade the audience of his point is imagery. Martin Luther King Jr. disagreed with the way the war was being handled, and thought nonviolent demonstrations would be more efficient. When he argues that the war's immoral nature should be "incandescently clear," he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, "the integrity and life of America.". On April 4, 1967 at Riverside Church in New York, MLK delivered "Beyond Vietnam" , which created a different perspective on the Vietnam war, in which is a negative thing. Acasestudy.com 2007-2019 All rights reserved. In this way, he appeals to the emotions of the audience and challenges the logic behind an unnecessary war. In a solemn tone, he talks about their crops being destroyed and their water being poisoned, presumably referring to Agent Orange. These emotionally charged images would seemingly convince anyone that the cause for this war could not possibly be just. In his speech on the meaninglessness of the Vietnam war and to persuade the audience to listen to its own conscience rather than to conform to the idea of war in the name of patriotism, King Jr draws from the realms of economy, society, polity as well as religion and philosophy. The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis. Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. StudyCorgi. The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. Is Hydrogen Fuel Efficient Enough to Replace Fossil Fuels in the Near Future. In Dr. Martin Luther King's speech "Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence" (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. Another rhetorical device is the common ground he establishes in his last sentence where he writes, "This is the story of Why We Can't Wait" (King 98-99). He repeatedly stresses upon breaking the silence because in this situation being silent was a sin. Right at the outset, King involves religious figures to establish the credibility for his reason and to prove that war was improper and inhuman. (21). The speech deemed racial segregation to be an inhumane practice that subdivides society into groups that essentially alienate them from the true sense of humanity; which is brotherhood. Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his opinion on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best King was really able to speak to his audience by using evidence, reasoning, and a persuasive writing style throughout his speech. 838 Words Moreover, Martin Luther King states that after the French were defeated, it looked as if independence and land reform would come again through the Geneva Agreement (King). Let us not wallow in the valley of despair. (King). In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audience's pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech "Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence" that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition. On April 4, 1967, Martin Luther King delivered his first major public statement against the Vietnam War, entitled "Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break the Silence." Addressing a crowd of 3,000 at Riverside Church in New York City, King condemned the war as anti-democratic, impractical, and unjust. To further strengthen, the credibility of his argument and question the morality behind the war, he says, Since I am a preacher by calling, I suppose it is not surprising that I have seven major reasons for bringing Vietnam into the field of my moral vision. This essay was written by a fellow student. His speech grows deeply sarcastic at times. He talks about the innocent people killed in the crossfire, mostly children. King uses personal anecdotes, elaborate word choice, and reliable facts to persuade his audience of the injustice of the war. The persuasive techniques utilized by King Jr are aimed at making people think over the outcomes of Vietnam war and if it was not against Americas integrity. However, his speech is not filled entirely with only emotionally charged words and phrases or just with pictures of war and destruction or poverty. The war lasted from 1955 to 1975.The nation as a whole began to uproar over the war and the major consequences of the war. Public Speech. In conclusion, Martin Luther King, Jr uses ethos, pathos, and logos, among other rhetorical devices, to support his argument that American policy in Vietnam was inconsistent with its treatment of African-Americans in the United States. He then paints a picture of the suffering endured by Vietnam and tells how the United States has a long history of doing the wrong thing to this tiny country. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." However, the persuasiveness of his speeches does not come solely from his ability to connect with his audience's emotions but from an extraordinary ability to reason and validate his point. Kings letter is a response to those in the church who have critizied him, Yet, instead of apologizing, he stands strong for his cause and turns it around on them stating his own critisim. In Dr. Martin Luther Kings speech Beyond VietnamA Time to Break Silence (1967), Dr. King asserts that the war in Vietnam is totally immoral and has far reaching negative implications not only for Vietnam, but for The United States and the rest of the World as well. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. He quotes Langston Hughes, in his speech to establish a connection between the struggle for civil liberty in United States and the oppression in Vietnam. Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism Martin Luther King Jr proves to all throughout his speech Beyond Vietnam --- A Time to Break Silence that the Vietnam war was unjust by his use of emotional diction, the allusion of Jim crow, and repetition. He does it to engage peoples imagination and to awaken their consciences. He also affirms that people have better options and that the idea of war, despite that it sounds patriotic is basically inhuman. And, to argue that King 's most radical days were never fulfilled; that his next campaign was to confront the president over the Vietnam War and economic disparity, a direct confrontation with a president over an immoral war state Hill and Wang from the book review. Apart from drawing a parallel between the situation in Vietnam and America, he shows neither stood to gain from it. Along with calming someone, you can inspire others with your, In Kings speech, the use of sensory and visceral language is abundant, creating an emotional and powerful atmosphere. His choice of words in the speech is meant to have a direct effect on the audience's psychology. "The Speech Beyond Vietnam: A Time to Break Silence by Martin Luther King, Jr: Rhetorical Analysis." There is at the outset a very obvious and almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam and the struggle I, and others, have been waging in America. Moreover, this set of diction allows King to logically state that he can not continue to fight on behalf of the oppressed if he himself doesn't address their oppressor, the U.S. government. Instead, King chooses to use facts to show what an illness war is. He is using vivid language to describe the casualties; however, they are also supported by evidence, as he is using precise numbers in this part of the speech. describing the ways in which the war is detrimental to the American people, King writes that "Vietnam. By claiming that the United States, "the greatest purveyor of violence," prefers, "massive doses of violence to solve its problems," King effectively establishes the U.S. government as the pervasive wrongdoer. This part of the speech is evoking violent images of death that would affect the emotions of the audience. Dr. King plainly states his purpose near the beginning of his speech. May 4, 2022. https://studycorgi.com/the-speech-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence-by-martin-luther-king-jr-rhetorical-analysis/. Then Dr. King says that the church should oppose the war simply because it is counter to the ministry of Jesus Christ. His pleas are first to the audiences sense of logic and their immediate concerns for their own country. He means to make people ask questions of themselves and ponder over the meaninglessness and uselessness of war and what would remain behind once the war was over. ' (Document, The war in Vietnam to do this day has gone down as one of the influential and controversial wars in United States history. Favorite Quote:Make as many as mistakes as you want, just don't make the same mistake. The problems being faced by either America or Vietnam were never going to be solved through rifles but through peaceful and nonviolent action. This demonstrates to the audience that he realizes it is going to be difficult for them to speak out in opposition of the government. As a leader of his people, King took the stand to take radical measures to overcome the false promises of the sovereign government that had been addressing the issues of racial segregation through unimplemented transparent laws that did nothing to change the grim realities of the society. His use of imagery and diction is aimed at making people break their silence and express their anger clearly. He says we were taking the black young men who had been crippled by our society and sending them eight thousand miles away to guarantee liberties in Southeast Asia which they had not found in southwest Georgia and East Harlem. King uses this statement to point out the inconsistency with America trying to establish freedom far away before establishing freedom on their own home soil. Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam 534 Words | 3 Pages In 1967, Martin Luther King Jr. delivered his speech "Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence." In the speech, King argues against American involvement in the Vietnam War and explains why he cannot remain silent. King argues that all people are created equal and directly challenged the outdated and abhorrent views that upheld the false flag of racial superiority among White Americans. Rhetorical Analysis Of Mlk's Beyond Vietnam. Rhetorical Analysis, Martin Luther King Rhetorical Devices Analysis, Rhetorical Analysis of Martin Luther King Jr.S Speech, A Rhetorical Analysis Journey Through Martin Luther King Jr.s SpeechI Have a Dream. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. In his argument, King mounts a multi-pronged attack on America's participation in the Vietnam war and also gains people's sympathy for the Vietnamese. Through his use of imagery, diction, and parallel structure, Martin Luther King Jr associates the war in Vietnam with injustice in his famous speech, Beyond Vietnam A Time to Break Silence. Martin Luther King Jr. applies imagery throughout his speech in order to illustrate the horrors of the war to arouse anger at its atrocities and injustice. His efforts to consolidate and harmonise the US into one country for all is reflected in many of his writings and speeches spanning his career. Not to mention, many young people protested because they were the ones being drafted while others were against the war because the anti-war movement grew increasingly popular among the counterculture and drug culture in American society and. Titled as the I Have a Dream Speech, he read this speech to the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audience's anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. Dr. King paints a vivid, heart-wrenching picture of the devastation in Vietnam. He was in the process of proving that it wasn 't a money issue in America, but an equality issue. So, what America is doing to other nations like Vietnam also matters. Throughout the first paragraph of Kings speech, he used emotional diction with words such as struggle, poverty, and poor to prove that the war in Vietnam was bringing down the Americans and their families fighting overseas. Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-martin-luther-kings-beyond-vietnam-a-time-to-break-silence/, Rhetorical of Analysis of Martin Luther Kings, I Have a Dream Speech, Break, Break, Break by Alfred Lord Tennyson Analysis, Martin Luther King Jr.: A Civil Rights Activist Who Changed, Rhetorical Analysis Martin Luther King Jr. versus Malcolm X, Martin Luther King Jr. The line, "For the sake of those boys, for the sake of this government, for the sake of the hundreds of thousands trembling under our violence, I cannot be silent," demonstrates how King uses parallelism. Rhetorical devices are included in Martin Luther Kings speeches to prove conflict. When he argues that the wars immoral nature should be incandescently clear, he implies to his audience that those who do not voice their opinion against the war are not concerned for, the integrity and life of America. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. For these practical and logical reasons, the church should join the opposition. Despite criticism from speaking out about things other than civil rights, King uses syntax, rhetorical strategies, and appeals to . He states, repeatedly, To begin, King uses figurative language in the first half of his speech to highlight the destructive nature of the war, strengthening his overall position. 6 Effective Content Marketing Strategies You May Have Overlooked, Market Analysis Definition (With Explanation and Examples). Registration number: 419361 Not only were they fighting for their own rights in 1976, but they were sending away the son, husbands, brothers of other Americans thousands of miles away to the country of Vietnam to fight an unjust war for the rights of the people in Southeast Asia. They wander into the towns and see thousands of the children, homeless, without clothes, running in packs on the streets like animals (20). Both religion and society condemn war and even popular religious figures have stood up to speak against it for the toll it takes upon human lives and for it is against the spirit of humanity and brotherhood. At last the paper discusses and assesses how to what an extent Kings dream came true with self-elected sources as backrest for the asses. In other words, the resources were used for the soldiers, yet the poor still needed them just as so. Moreover, Martin Luther King Jr meticulously chooses specific words that carry with them a negative connotation that helps associate the Vietnamese war with injustice. However, he wishes that they would have lived up to his respect, and continues to hope that they will do so in the future. The paper concludes that Kings dream have not come true, but, Rhetorical Analysis Of Martin Luther King Beyond Vietnam. It permits Dr. King to enlighten people of what was going in that time period. Don't let the fear of striking out keep you from playing the game. cite it correctly. However, he is about to arm them with many valid reasons why it is crucial for them to join the opposition. StudyCorgi. These two techniques played a crucial role in furthering his purpose and in provoking a powerful response from the audience that made this speech memorable and awe-inspiring. Please note that while we value your input, we cannot respond to every message. They now also understand that the Vietnam War plays a bigger role in America than just the men gone to war, it affects others too, like them. He uses the word 'We', connecting with the audience and ensuring them that together they will bring change to social conditions and attitudes. It is why while he attacks America's intervention in Vietnam on the one hand, on the other he brings people's attention towards the other side of life where America can become a beacon of hope and peace for the entire world including Vietnam. At Along with, and the almost facile connection between the war in Vietnam, First, Martin Luther King Jr. uses emotional appeals to persuade his audience that the Vietnam War is unjust because it is unfairly killing the poor and its destroying the country. Apart from highlighting the wicked nature of the war, King Jr 's speech also sets the urgency for protest. Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . Thomas 1 Javon Thomas Mrs. Yelton English 1301 - Period 4 14 September 2018 Beyond Vietnam Rhetorical Analysis Essay In Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, Beyond Vietnam-A Time to Break Silence, King discusses his views on America's involvement in the Vietnam War. King successfully brings out the irony behind the war through the use of figurative speech and plenty of imagery to paint a picture of destruction and doom in Vietnam. Dr. King includes a brief, but poignant history of the war in Vietnam which is important because he needs to prove that he knows and understands the politics of the situation. Additionally, when King claims that all this horror is in the name of America, he appeals to his audiences anger, leading them to believe that it is time for them to break silence on the fact that the United States became involved in an unjust war in Vietnam. Read More Use Of Nonviolence In Cesar Chavez's Speech 409 Words | 2 Pages Martin Luther King Jr. was extremely passionate about nonviolence. For example, this quote personifies war as being an enemy. new way beyond the darkness that seems so close around us. To achieve this, he used rhetorical strategies such as appeal to pathos and repetition. Acting almost as a climax, King lyrically urges his audience to voice their opinions and wage a war against this unjustified war in Vietnam. King is effectively able to convey his point about his topic by using rhetorical devices such as logos, ethos, pathos. He expresses that the first step toward equality as the earth moving and nations running with fear. All of the valid arguments and vivid imagery Dr. King uses combine to make this a very effective, passionate and memorable speech. King proved this partly with the quote, America would never invest the necessary funds in the rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued (King, Beyond, 9). For example, in paragraph 7, King discusses the harsh reality of the war. All they wanted was to save the soul of America (King, Beyond, 42). This comparison is very sobering. He changes his tone from passive to passionate. By continuing well Finally, Martin Luther King Jr. uses parallelism within his own reflection to evoke emotions in his audience to show that . In his speech addressed to the laymen and clergy at Riverside Church he used pathos, logos, imagery, and an argument shift to list the reasons why America should withdraw their troops, and to create sympathy within his audience. Furthermore, when these stylistic elements are concluded with his use of parallelism, King effectively establishes America's involvement in the Vietnam War as unjust. Perhaps the most convincing part of the speech is the emotional appeal. Pathos is a method applied to represent an appeal to feelings and emotions in a speech and other various kinds of writing. Supplemental understanding of the topic including revealing main issues described in the particular theme; In addition, his use of parallelism allows him to appeal to his audience's pity for the oppressed in order for him to express his call to action, a call for activism that goes beyond Vietnam. Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task. Lastly, Martin Luther King uses logos in his famous speech. Need a custom essay sample written specially to meet your King uses this metaphor to emphasize the treatment of African Americans in America. By showing his own emotions, King inspires compassion in the. Widely known for his work in the Civil Rights Movement, Martin Luther King Jr eventually also gained momentum in the anti-war movement against the war in Vietnam.